Editor
I would like to clarify some statements ascribed to me in Mr. Robert McConnell's article, 'Conference Ethics of Immigration,' (The Social Contract, Winter 1993-94), and amplify upon others.
? While my remarks did include my opinion that 'the American family needs time to heal itself,' and while I oppose the current high levels of immigration, I do not support a moratorium on immigration.
? While I did say that over 100 million people today live in countries other than those in which they were born, I did not mean to suggest that they would all move here if they could (though several million would).
? While the United States takes in many refugees, I stated that this country annually resettles more immigrants and refugees than the rest of the world combined.
? While I suggested that the U.S. should emphasize the skills of newcomers, and reduce the emphasis on family reunification, I believe that the reunification of immediate family members - spouses, sons and daughters, - should be retained.
My reference to the present policy generating a 'false sense of entitlement' referred to other than immediate family members who are caught in a vast backlog. Specifically, immigration experts have suggested that their technical eligibility to immigrate legally in the distant future may encourage them to immigrate illegally today.
Sincerely,
Richard Estrada
Irving, Texas